About Me

Name:Mike
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Defensa Si'! Invasion No!

Continuing on with my prior discussion, pre-emptive war is absurd because it tries to negate a segment of God's ongoing Creation.  Certainly more citizens are killed than terrorists.  Man does have the right of self-defense and to defend his neighbor.  That is why Texas Joe Horn will not be prosecuted for killing two Columbians who had just burglarized his neighbor's home.  Laws only reflect the status quo of God's providence.  Otherwise, the thieves would have been able to cross the border and tell all of their friends what a bunch of wimps Americans are until there are more burglaries and until Americans are killed in their own homes.  The precept that "a man's home is his castle" did not originate recently in Texas by statute as you might think from listening to cable news.  It is part of the tradition of English common law.   It reflects the reality of human nature in Christian England which is still valid today...that anyone has the right to use force, even deadly force, to protect his home or his neighbor's home from intruders.  Similarly, military action may be used to defend one's own country or another country from attack or occupation by a foreign power.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Neo-Paradox


Human liberation at the individual level is in Christian baptism.  The person becomes free of the effects of original sin and of all past sins in the person's life.  This does not include the effects of original sin that are common to all mankind.

Modernism has tried to change the Church's teaching with regard to original sin, but to no avail.  God is always in control of the universe, and man must live according to God's law.

The Bavarian mystic of the last century Therese Neumann, when asked if America will experience war on its soil, she replied, "No, but at the end of this century America will be destroyed economically by a series of natural disasters."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can Muslims and Christians Co-Exist Peacefully?


Christ came to bring peace on earth.  God allows evil in the world, as when there is a breakdown of peace, only to bring about a greater good in the ongoing creation of the world.  

In order to comprehend Islamic jihad, a Christian must first examine Islam's Gnostic roots prior to Muhammad in the 6th century.  The Gnostics were a group in the Middle East who rejected Christ as is evident in the New Testament account of Simon Magus.  They had an extremely pessimistic and dualistic conception of reality.  Their leaders were actually attempting to control the masses through their claim of special esoteric knowledge.  Muhammad from the desert of Arabia was a great secular and religious leader.  By embracing the idea of monotheism, he raised the ante for Arabs who were in fact second cousins of the Jews and also claimed descent from Abraham.  Now for the Muslim it becomes a question of whether the truth of monotheism can be absorbed.  Following their Prophet, they reject their animist deities and believe only in Allah.  This is actually a halfway point between Judaism and Christianity. 

The Muslim in today's world is beset by doubt and uncertainty about the future.  He or she is usually defeatist and feels powerless.  It is therefore often difficult for a Christian to engage in meaningful dialogue. 

As all of history is within the providence of the Almighty, inter-religious wars become opportunities and challenges for greater dialogue and understanding.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Original Sin, Free Will and Liberation


Continuing with my prior topic, the question of human nature is vital to any understanding of the proper exercise of the will.  Man was created with free will and because he chose to act against his Creator, he lost certain gifts and now needs grace in order to be truly free.  It is certainly not the case, as certain Enlightenment philosophers supposed, that man can find happiness by liberating himself from all social constraints.  Rather man is in a perpetual state of becoming, and liberation from the effects of original sin or his base nature is only achieved through hard work.  Freedom is not the norm but the exceptional case and can only be kept through constant vigilance.

Daniel O'Connell, the Irish MP in London, worked to bring about liberation for the Irish with a true understanding of human nature.  Hence his labours bore much good fruit, even if posthumously.  His son Maurice following his example enlisted as a soldier in the South American wars of liberation.  This work has taken people as they are and helped them to become better individuals.

True liberation simply does not follow the Marxist utopian model.  Nor is it achieved by destroying all barriers to worldwide capitalist growth.  


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Goldberg versus Buchanan


Neo-Conservatism has been likened to the Jacobinism which touched off the French Revolution.  True conservatism grew out of the revulsion of the civilized world, particularly in Ireland and Great Britain, to the excesses of Jacobins and their reign of terror in France.  Neo-conservatives like to use words which disguise their Marxist precursors, claiming to be the upholders of righteousness and against terrorists when in fact their very foundation was terrorism in the modern sense of the word.  They are exceptionalists, particularists, and elitists who have basically a materialist worldview which to them justifies anything including pre-emptive war to advance their own agenda of world capitalism.

Jonah Goldberg rose through the ranks of National Review the primary periodical devoted to the conservative movement founded by the arch-conservative Bill Buckley, and like Buckley a graduate of Yale University.  Although Buckley was himself Catholic, he was often at odds with Church teaching on such issues as birth control and solidarity with those who are less fortunate.  But as a conservative he shared the general dislike for liberalism and communism arising from the ashes of the Paris uprising.

Pat Buchanan grew up with strong Catholic Christian family values and a solid Jesuit education at Georgetown University.  His weltanshauung grows out of the two thousand year old tradition since Christ lived on earth.  Christianity took root in the remnants of the Roman Empire and is the basis for whatever unity still exists in the West. 

While I am not one to take sides in other peoples' disagreements, I believe that the proof of the pudding is a question of the truth of Christ's life and message.  If He was an offbeat Jewish rabbi Who was executed by the sadistic Roman overlords, then there is nothing to stop naked force from determining what society holds to be right, as in the case of the Jacobin rule.  This seems to be the ideal of Goldberg and the neo-conservatives.  

On the other hand, if Christ did in fact rise bodily from the dead by His own power, as His apostles believed and taught, then we aught to put great weight on the social gospel taught by the living Church which He founded and whose leaders He appointed, and their successors in the world today.  Only fools would be so arrogant as to disregard the pope's skepticism regarding the tenets of capitalism, and the Church's perennial outspokenness against war in general and pre-emptive war in particular.

Looking at the world in this light, Buchanan is not being inconsistent in his support for the West's defense of Croatia, for example, which was the eastern border of Charlemagne's realm and therefore practically essential to keeping the Christian Church alive in the Western world.  What could be more vital and important than that?  As far as throwing smaller nations to the wolves, Buchanan is in fact cautioning prudence in not allowing the West to go down precipitously in flames over quarrels which have absolutely no value looking at the big picture.  If the Christian ideal is true, Buchanan will be proven right.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Olmert Playing a Game of Chicken?


We cannot stop Israel from launching a pre-emptive air strike against Iran's nuclear facilities.  Two neo-conservatives, former UN Ambassador John Bolton and Weekly Standard publisher Bill Kristol have signaled that Israel would launch such attack toward the end of George W. Bush's term of office if Barack Obama is elected.  

The question is whether Olmert is bluffing.  If such a strike is actually launched in violation of international law, Bush's hands would be tied insofar as the American military is already bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq.  We can expect Achmadinejad to retaliate heavily against our troops on Iraq's eastern border.  His plan is probably to suck America into a protracted ground war, further stretching our already depleted troop levels.  Upon taking office, Obama will try to implement diplomacy.  Another large scale domestic terrorist attack would bring America into the conflict if Congress declares war against a known enemy.

If McCain wins in November, he should make it clear to Israel that America opposes any pre-emptive Israeli attack against Iran, and that if Israel chooses to go that route as they did in Lebanon earlier this year, that America will not offer any military aid.  They are on their own.  Hopefully Olmert would then back down.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Being Gay All in the Brain?


The recent scientific studies correlating similarities in brain structure and activity as between homosexual men and heterosexual women, and as between homosexual women and heterosexual men, raise interesting questions concerning the judicial decisions promoting the so-called "gay agenda".

First of all, no two human brains are exactly alike, even when considering identical twins. This means that there is a spectrum or continuum with regard to the brain characteristics in both males and females, ranging from male brains that are extremely masculine to those that share many feminine characteristics, and vice versa for female brains. The ancient Chinese understood this as the principle of yin and yang. There is no clear dividing line between what could be called a feminine brain and a masculine brain in a man, or between a masculine brain and a feminine brain in a woman. Gender is not determined by brain structure but rather prenatally based upon inherited characteristics for sex determination, i.e. the presence of either two X chromosomes for females, or alternatively one X chromosome and one Y chromosome for males. Therefore, societal differentiation between man and woman which predates the existence of the state cannot be negated by judicial fiat. This of course means that judges at either the state or federal levels have no right or power to redefine marriage. All marriage licenses for so-called homosexual marriages are prima facie invalid.

Considering just the male brain, scientific evidence shows that among men with same-sex orientation, there is similarity with straight women in the preponderance of verbal skills and in ways of communicating. Both hemispheres in the brain are approximately equal in volume which is unlike the brains of most straight men. Judges have no right to try and second guess God's providence in not creating all men and all women with the same characteristics. There is always a measure of diversity in nature. It is the role of lawyers to uphold traditions which are in keeping with created nature such as the institution of matrimony, rather than trying to remold human beings according to an unrealistic ideal of equality for all.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reverend Wright and the Nuclear Dilemma


Bill O'Reilly and other commentators don't seem to understand some of the subtleness of certain moral questions.  Take for example Bill's overview of the appearance of Reverends Wright and Pfleger at a dinner gathering hosted by the Cook County Bar Association.

O'Reilly took issue with Rev. Wright's reference to the nuclear bombs dropped on Japanese cities at the end of WWII in the sermon in which Rev. Wright makes his point quoting former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Edward Peck that America's chickens are coming home to roost.   O'Reilly bases his opinion on the fact that Japan was not ready to surrender and that more civilians would likely have died had not Truman chosen to drop the bomb on Hiroshima.  This is a classic example of the philosophical error known as consequentialism in which it is supposed that the ends somehow justify immoral means to achieve those ends.  The obvious fallacy in this line of reasoning can be seen in Gen. Curtis LeMay's gloating at the end of WWII, "We scorched and boiled and baked to death more people in Tokyo that night of March 9-10 than went up in vapor in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined."  Everyone knows that America defeated Japan and Germany in WWII.  To say that America and Britain acted justly in bombing civilian targets because more civilians would have been killed had we not done so is simply preposterous bragging.  That same faulty logic could be used to justify the murder of Jews or any act of terrorism.  It just depends on whose ox is being gorged.  God always has the final word in sorting out the just and unjust. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Winning Strategy


McCain will have to tone down his war rhetoric.  Regardless of whether Israel attacks Iran during the waning months of the Bush Administration, McCain will have to resist political pressure to send troops to Tehran.   America must reassert her independence as a nation, not as a dependency on world financial structures. 

Although Hillary Clinton has endorsed Barack Obama, McCain needs the votes of disaffected Clintonites to win in November.  They basically want a guarantee that McCain will not make the same mistakes Bush made in leading America into a foolhardy and unnecessary military adventure.  McCain clearly has the advantage at this point because of the Bradley effect.  The question is, can he keep this advantage going into Novemeber by keeping America out of another war?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Science, Technology and Applications


With Israel contemplating a preemptive air strike against Iranian nuclear facilities, it is incumbent upon Senator McCain to make it clear that he will not allow America to be duped into another costly and unnecessary war during his watch as president...that is, if he expects to win in November.

Reiterating what I said before, this election is McCain's to lose in the Fall.  Regardless of poll numbers, the Bradley effect is a giant factor to offset any negative poll numbers as the race begins to tighten up.  The genetic components favor McCain, just as they gave Barack Obama the edge in the Democratic primary against Hillary Clinton.  Liberal Democrats like to discount gender as insignificant, as in the promotion of gay marriage.  In fact, it is probably the most significant factor in a presidential election, followed closely by race and ethnicity.

Getting back to the scientific question, knowledge per se is something good.  The scientific discoveries of Albert Einstein and the other physicists are all good for the human race.  The problem comes from how this knowledge is used by man.  A purely materialistic evolutionary worldview is inadequate to arriving at the proper application of scientific knowledge.  There must be a sound philosophical framework to bring into play a hierarchy of values to bear. 

The Christian worldview does not view the good fortune of our neighbors as our own misfortune.  Christ commanded us to rejoice with those who are rejoicing.   On the geopolitical front in terms of global strategy, this means that the West as the heir to Christian culture and values must not become jealous just because certain Arab and Muslim nations are both becoming rich in oil reserves and are acquiring nuclear capability for peaceful purposes.   We must encourage them to develop their nuclear potential to the maximum instead of destroying their nuclear reactors.  We must start treating Arabs and Muslims with respect as our brothers and sisters, instead of as second-class citizens.  This will allow America to tap our own oil reserves both offshore and in ANWR, and to develop alternative energy sources including wind and solar energy.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

California judges just too damn arrogant...


The decision of the California Supreme Court imposing homosexual marriages in the state arising from an appeal by maverick San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom is the final straw in the judicial tyranny that has rocked America during the last several decades.

The majority on the court are liberal academic elitists who care nothing about objective standards that have shaped the values of Californians.  They only care about the false claims of some members of minorities claiming discrimination.  What they really want is to advance their own elitist agenda to usurp more power for themselves.  Thank God we still have judges with integrity like Schwarzenegger appointee Carol Corrigan and the others who do not follow the elitist orthodoxy and the secular religion of the majority.   The majority judges will be shown for what that they are at the polls in November later this year...a bunch of losers.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Adriana Lima and TFVs





Reportedly on her 27th birthday last week supermodel Adriana Lima became engaged to the Serbian basketball player Mark Jaric'.  The Brazilian underwear angel along with Giselle Bundchen and Alessandra Ambrosio have achieved great success in the fashion industry.  In her interview in the March 2006 issue of GQ, Ms. Lima describes why she has kept her virginity.  Apparently before that time she had only seriously dated rock star Lenny Kravitz and New York Yankees superstar Derek Jeter, and Prince Wenzeslaus of Liechtenstein since then.  I have nothing against GQ.  My cousin Shawn was once on the magazine cover along with some other guys.  However, the GQ interviewer along with the American culture apparently now regard fornication, i.e. sex before marriage, as the social and cultural norm.  Ms. Lima to her credit represents something better.

In America, everything contrary to the New Dispensation is a cultural regression representing decadence.  Of course the liberal politicians try to make it seem as progress and liberation.  Actually nothing could be further from the truth.

I wish Ms. Lima the best of happiness in her upcoming marriage.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pundits Clueless about Hillary Clinton


Ever notice how the cable TV pundits are obsessed about why conservative talk show hosts and financial backers seem to prefer Hillary to Obama?  The speculation runs rampant.  They believe that Hillary would be easier to beat than Obama,  or they are playing a sinister, cynical double game to make liberals think that Hillary is the best candidate for Republicans so that Obama will eventually win the nomination, etc...

A reality check:  Conservatives including Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, and Richard Scaife would really prefer Hillary to be elected president  rather than Obama.  Therefore, since it is not certain that McCain will win in November, these conservatives logically want Hillary as the Democrat candidate just in case McCain does lose in November.  That is why they are asking Democrat and Independent primary and caucus voters and Democrat super-delegates to cast their votes for Hillary.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pope's Visit Marks Cultural Crossroads


Pope Benedict XVI's arrival is a much awaited historical moment which will help to bring about the necessary changes in the American cultural evolution.   The pope has expressed his disfavor with the rampant sexual abuse occurring within American society  including human trafficking, prostitution, pornography, and the exploitation of women for economic gain.  Much of this derives from the replacement of authentic Christian values with secular materialism in America.  The pope also brings a reminder of the sacredness of human life which contradicts the modern view which accepts and encourages abortion, euthanasia and capital punishment.  The pope is strongly against torture and seeks to bring about peace throughout the world, opposing all forms of militant extremism as contrary to  God's commandments.   The pope encourages environmental protection standards and more care for the poor to bring about social justice as Christ Himself taught.  The pope also stresses religious freedom.  America stands to gain much by heeding the pope's message of hope.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Horse or No Horse





If the presidential race were a horse race, the smart money and the Las Vegas oddsmakers would probably favor Obama.

Why?  Because he is young, bright, well educated, well funded, and the nation wants change.

Because this is not a horse race, there are other intangible factors that come into play.  One is the Bradley effect.  Historically, polling data has proven to be notoriously unreliable in an election between a black male and a white male.  This would tend to give McCain the edge in the general.

Secondly, it is well established that pedigrees play a key role in a horse race.  For example, Seabiscuit's sire was Hard Tack whose sire was Man o' War.  This would also tend to give McCain the edge because white males have historically won presidential elections in the United States of America.  But again, this is not a horse race.

America is ready for change.  This means the Democratic Party.  Since Barack Obama is unlikely to win in November because of the Bradley effect, realistically this leaves only Hillary Clinton as the candidate to beat John McCain.

Hillary is expected to win big in Pennsylvania on April 22.  The question then becomes whether the Democrat Super-Delegates can put aside there petty differences and unite behind the one candidate who has the best chance of winning.  If not, the prize goes to John McCain.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234567891011Next »